Is the Alabama abortion law a gift to the Pro-Choicers?

Pro-Choicers celebrating outside the U.S. Supreme Court in 2016

Sounds like the State of Alabama just damned the pro-life movement to the wrong side of history today, and probably sold out their potential victory in the Supreme Court, or worse, damaged the Republican Party's 2020 election hopes. Forcing girls who are 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, any age under 16 who were raped, to go through a pregnancy that potentially kill them, and probably the baby ironically, so this Alabama law, when it comes to the unborn child of an 11-year-old raped victim, does nothing to protect the child ironically.

So why pro-lifers shooting themselves in the foot in a desperate attempt to destroy Roe v. Wade? No one knows. The Georgia law, although still wrong, is more sensible than the Alabama law. The Georgia law says abortion is blocked except for cases of rape and inbreeding, but the Alabama law says abortion is banned full-square, abortion is even illegal against the excuses of rape and inbreeding, and people probably won't like the idea of an inbred child, or a child born to an 11-year-old mother who was raped by a 40-year-old pervert, and this is damaging to the reputation of the pro-life philosophy, forcing a raped 11-year-old to spent nine months carrying her rapist's child, and then boom, die on the hospital bed, with the child.

Did Alabama SCREWED The Pro-Life Movement?

The pro-abortionist pro-choicers might have been given a victory lap by Alabama's jihadist extreme anti-abortion law that bans abortion even abortions for rape and inbreeding, even banning abortions for a raped pregnant 10-year-old girl who might die from the pregnancy probably before her baby would be born, worse-case scenario, the baby dying too after or even before birth. The pro-life movement has become too extreme against reproductive rights, and it may make the pro-lifers go even lower in the legacy of the abortion debate era that America is still trapped in since 1973. 

Could This Hurt The Republican Party In 2020?

The red states passing all these anti-safe-abortion laws could be toxic for the Republican Party in the 2020 United States elections, especially among women voters. If you know your politics very well, the majority of women voters always favor the Democratic Party over the Republicans. In the 2018 U.S. House of Representatives elections, 59% of women voters favored the House Democrats, to 40% of women voters favored the House Republicans all according Edison Research exit poll. In the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election, Democrat Hillary Clinton won 54% of women voters, and Republican Trump won just only 41% of their (women voters) votes also according to Edison Exit Polling. So is it too toxic for the Republicans, even for Trump, to attack women's reproductive rights? The answer based on the 2016 and 2018 results on women voters, absolutely toxic, already the Conservative Evangelical community vote in droves in each election in favor of Republicans because of their opposition to abortion, so if the Republicans finally do put their hands on women's reproductive rights, it might inspire women in America to vote in droves in favor of Democrats, and that sink the Republican Party full square. But will it ever happen? We're gonna have to see by 2020. 

Sources

1. Alabama's Abortion Law and more to come in Missouri - AL.com
2. Abortion restrictions carry political risk for Republicans in 2020 - Reuters